PHENOMENA OF LITERARY EVOLUTION
As an American essayist has said, this is the
moment-mad century; the century "that first discovered how large a moment
was; the century that makes a moment a colossal moment, as moments have never
been made before; the century that with telephone and telegraph and
printing-press, discovered the present tense and made all the world a voice on
a wire." It is also a very busy century. Never was the world in such a
hurry as now; never were its thoughts so broad and deep, its aims and
occupations so many and so diverse. It well behooves whosoever has ideas to
sell to the world to seek out what impression all this makes upon the
literature of the day, in what manner the century is being and should be
represented by print and paper. Why have predication and sentence-length
decreased? Why is the three-volume novel left behind with the rest of the
rubbish of the musty past? Why is the ubiquitous short story in such demand?
What bearing have the answers to these questions upon the structure of a
sentence? the shaping of a figure? the drawing of a parallel? the construction
of a story? the delineation of a character? or the presentation of a social
phase? If the idea merchant cannot answer these questions, it is high time for
him to get down to work. The world knows what it wants, but it will not trouble
itself to speak up and tell him. The world has no concern with him; it is
getting what it wants, and it will go on getting what it wants from others who
have got down to work.
The comparison of the growth of the individual
to the growth of the race, unlike most tricks of exposition, seems always to
increase in strength and worth. From childhood to manhood, the mind of the
individual moves from the simple to the complex. The thoughts of a child are
few in number and small in stature. At first, in ratiocinative processes, its
premises must cover little ground and be fully elaborated, and in the course of
the deduction or induction there can be no omission of the smallest detail. Not
an example can be avoided, not a step discarded. But the rounded mind of the
man objects to such a slow procedure. It leaps swiftly from cause to effect, or
vice versa, and concludes even as it leaps. The student refuses to sit
under a professor who lectures after the fashion of the kindergarten. It drives
him mad to have all things and the most obvious things explained at length. He
would as soon sit down and read Defoe in words of one syllable or do sums in
arithmetic on his fingers.
And so with the race. It has had its adolescence;
it is man-grown by now. The literature which delighted the race in its youth
still delights the youth of the individual; but the race is now in its prime,
and its literature must be a reflection of that prime. In obedience to the
general law of evolution, all thought and all methods of representing thought
must be concentrative. Language, spoken and written, has not escaped the
working of this law. Language, as a means of conveying thought, is primarily
figurative. The commonest words, used in the commonest ways, are stereotyped
figures - figures, once new-born and pink, fresh, vivid, strong, in an
elementary stage when the tongues of men groped for clearer expression. A
figure is the development of an analogy, the establishment of identity through
resemblance. As the race's first expression of the simplest thought was
figurative, so was its first aggregate of thoughts into one powerful or
beautiful whole. What is the allegory but a sustained figure? And it is to
allegory that all primitive peoples first resort. It appeals to them, who, if
they think at all, think like children. But the race to-day no longer has need
of that childish expedient. Spenser was the last great poet to use it. Bunyan's
Pilgrim's Progress is the only great allegory now extant, and it owed
its immediate and subsequent popularity to the illiterate masses, because they
were illiterate, and because it was simple, dealt with a vital question and was
powerfully, though crudely executed.
As Professor Sherman has pointed out, the use of
the analogy is to give to the material truth a spiritual setting - to make the
reader feel as well as think. The allegory does this, and in a
most sustained and expansive way. But the tendency of language is
concentrative. Hence, the passing of the allegory, and with it the parable and
fable. A study of the race's literature will reveal the replacement of these,
in inexorable sequence, by the running metaphor, the clause metaphor, the
phrase metaphor, the compound-word metaphor, and, lastly, the word metaphor.
The sustained figure has been reduced to a single figure, the allegoric analogy
to a word analogy. As the standard of mentality has risen, just so has the
dictum of man gone forth that he must and will do his own thinking. He no
longer wishes to have the thought iterated and reiterated and hammered in upon
him again and again. Pleonasm is repellent to him.
Thomson wrote, "compelled by strong
Necessity." "Compelled" is tautologised by "strong
Necessity," but none the less Pope amended the passage thus:
"Compelled by strong Necessity's supreme command." Imagine the race
to-day countenancing such bosh! But in condensing the allegory into the word
analogy, neither the material nor the spiritual dare be sacrificed. Nor have
they been sacrificed by the masters. In token whereof no better instance can be
cited than:
The barge she sat in, like a burnished throne,
Burned on the water.
There is the figure and the fact, the spiritual
and the material, all represented by one word. It was not the poet's place to
employ twenty lines of iambic pentameter in order to convey the semblance of
burnished gold to fire, flames, the sun, etc., as the barge floated on the
water; and it would have been highly inartistic had he done so. The reader is
not a child. He receives pleasure in constructing the whole appearance from out
of that one word, and he is exalted by realising the effect through his own
effort. And that is just what the reader wants.
"That style which leaves most to fancy in
respect to the manner in which facts or relations may be apprehended will be in
so far the easiest to read." It is in accordance with this truth that the
predication has decreased, and likewise the length of sentence. The tendency of
sentences has long been toward brevity and point. The race wants its reading
matter to be not only concentrative, compact, but crisp, incisive, terse. It
tolerates Mr. James, but it prefers Mr. Kipling. To the sins of the past let
the following sentence of Spenser attest:
Marry, soe there have been divers good
plottes devised, and wise counsells cast alleready about reformation of that
realme; but they say, it is the fatall desteny of that land, that noe purposes,
whatsoever are meant for her good, will prosper or take good effect, which,
whether it proceede from the very GENIUS of the soyle, or influence of the
starres, or that Allmighty God has not yet appoynted the time of her
reformation, or that he reserveth her in this unquiett state till for some
secrett scourdge, which shall by her come unto England, it is hard to be
knowen, but yet much to be feared.
Imagine the lustful blue pencil of the
twentieth-century editor wading through a sentence as that! And contrast it
with this from the pen of Emerson:
My friends, in these two errors, I think,
I find the causes of a decaying Church and a wasting unbelief. And what greater
calamity can fall upon a nation than the loss of worship? Then all things go to
decay. Genius leaves the temple to haunt the senate or the market. Literature
becomes frivolous. Science is cold. The eye of youth is not lighted by the hope
of other worlds, and age is without honour. Society lives to trifles, and when
men die we do not mention them.
A good illustration of the decline of sentence length is afforded by the
following figures, which give the average words per sentence for five hundred
periods:
Fabyan
Spenser
Hooker
Macaulay
Emerson
|
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
|
68.28
49.78
41.40
22.45
20.58
|
Every form of present-day literature exemplifies
this concentrative tendency. The growth of the short story has been marked by
the decay of the long novel. In the last century, and in the first portion of
this, novels of one volume were acceptable; but publishers preferred those of
two and three; nor were they avers to one of four, while five and six volume
novels were not at all uncommon. The average novel of to-day contains from
forty to seventy thousand words. What publisher would dream of even reading a
MS. of the cyclopean proportions of Les Misérables? Poe always
contended that the tale should be such that it could be read at one sitting.
The King's Jackal, recently brought out by Richard Harding Davis,
contains about twenty-seven thousand words, while Mr. Kipling seems to have set
the form for a novel of forty to fifty pages.
Again advantaging from our text, what the race
wants chiefly is the passing thing done in the eternal way. This makes our
literature largely episodal, and this want of the race Mr. Kipling has
satisfied. He is terse, bald, jerky, disconnected, but there is nothing
superfluous in his work. It consists only of the essentials, and is
fancy-exciting. And that is just what the race wants, for it is past the
kindergarten stage; it can do its own thinking. Give it the bare essentials,
and it will do the rest. It can think more rapidly than it can read the printed
words of the writer, and it is in a hurry. Division of labour, labour-saving
machinery, rapid transit, the telephone and the telegraph - a myriad and one
devices has the race invented for the economising of its energy and time. So in
all things it demands the greatest possible amount crammed into the smallest
possible space. And to this demand its literature must answer. The race does
not want novels and stories teeming with superfluities. The unpruned shall be
cast aside unread. What it wants is the meat of the matter, and it wants it
now.
Jack London
From the October, 1900 issues of The Bookman.
Back to the Jack London Bookstore First Editions.